Spider-Man

Written by Oliver Willis
Published September 18, 2002

Spider-Man is the best superhero movie of the past 20 years.

It's closest relative in the success of translating both the immense scale and intimate characterizations of the character is 1978's Superman. When Superman was released, Christopher Reeve was an unknown who took that blank slate and brought Superman to life, his Clark Kent was a bumbling and stumbling fool while Superman was heroic and majestic. I thought Tobey Maguire was a good choice to play Spider-Man but worried that his fame may dominate the role - so it would be "Tobey Maguire as Spider-Man". Well, file that away in the cabinet of bad ideas, because Tobey Maguire is the living embodiment of Peter Parker and Spider-Man. Instantly you sympathize with the character, the lowly everygeek who gets pushed around at school and dares not approach the girl he's loved since he was six, filled out beautifully by Kirsten Dunst.

X-Men was a good comic-to-screen execution but had the unfortunate need to explain several characters' origins in a short amount of time, Spider-Man takes the advantage of a solitary origin and allows us to see the character evolve with time - stunningly faithful to the source material but moving at a good on-screen clip. When Peter is bitten by the spider and receives his powers, you jump with him roof to roof, laugh as he tries out his new abilities and marvel as his motions loosen up and become like the human spider who's existed in our minds and in two dimensions for these many years. Instead of dark and brooding, we get a hero who takes tragedy and becomes heroic and a symbol to the people he helps. The credo of "With great power comes great responsibility" is translated by Maguire into the "Friendy neighborhood Spider-Man" who makes the skyscrapers of New York his home.

The Big Apple should get some on-screen credit as well, Spider-Man is able to simultaneously swing above the people but weave his web from building to building - never skipping a beat as it becomes second nature to wind his way through this world unto itself.

Willem Dafoe does a good job as industrialist Norman Osborn who makes the transition to the maniacal Green Goblin. The scenes where he struggles with his madness are both funny and sad, while the explanations for his appearance are actually made more logical within the context of the film than in the comics - usually the opposite. My only complaint is that he is a little too much of a wisecracker than menancing villain, but his actions in the films final third make up for it.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Spider-Man
Published: September 18, 2002
Type:
Section: Video: Adventure
Filed Under: Video: Drama, Video: SF
Writer: Oliver Willis
Oliver Willis's BC Writer page
Oliver Willis's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Oliver Willis
Video: Drama
Video: SF
All Video: Adventure Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 18, 2002 @ 18:43PM — Eric Olsen

Thanks O, very compelling.

#2 — September 23, 2002 @ 23:32PM — Crimson Cow [URL]

Uh huh. I'm with you on this one.

In contrast to many of the films in a pretty disappointing summer, Spiderman was worth the wait. Much of that due to the casting. Y'know, they say that effects are king in the movies, which probably explains why so many of them suck so spectacularly. With Tobey Maguire at the helm, the webslinger thrives.

Only minor downside lay in the fact that, having laid out a story that was both compelling and true to the comicbook roots, screenwriter David Koepp (Panic Room) felt obliged to drift a little too often into spectacularly cringeworthy dialogue (Final Kirsten Dunst scene a case in point), but hey, you cant have it all...yet.

Also not really in agreement with the Batman comment. I mean, here's a guy who dresses up as a bat, with a serious Philip Marlowe-esque isolation complex. I'd say Batman Returns dealt with that far better than the original, and that the first two films work pretty well together in establishing that, hey, our superheroes, they can be screwed up too. If there's one criticism that can be leveled at the Superman series, and indeed at the character itself from conception to resolution, is that this isn't touched on enough.

As for the Joel Schumacher efforts...god help us all.

Keep writing, man.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/663)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!