<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:39:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Caroline on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/12/06/030749.php#comment-195170</link>
<description>Went to www.beatlesgear.com but found only amplifiers there. Nothing more.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">195170@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:39:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ed Driscoll on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/12/06/030749.php#comment-24730</link>
<description>Derek,

That&#039;s a rather harsh statement about a book that&#039;s been very well received by both musicians and fans. What are some examples of mistakes you found in it?

Ed</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24730@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:33:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Derek on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/12/06/030749.php#comment-24729</link>
<description>I bought the book, but then discovered the web site www.beatlesgear.com Once I figured out that the web site was not connected to the book, it dawned on me that the book is a joke and so is much of the information in it. Babiuk&#039;s research falls short when compared to the hard facts provided in the website. My guess, he&#039;s just a fan who went with whatever he was told just to fill the pages of the book. I don&#039;t mean to be so hard on the author, but the book cost way more than the web site and is obviously full of a huge amount of mistakes.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24729@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:26:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ed Driscoll on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/12/06/030749.php#comment-4305</link>
<description>Darryl,

Oh, and Eric Clapton was largely responsible for introducing the Les Paul to the British blues scene, through the use of it on the classic &lt;i&gt;Bluesbreakers&lt;/i&gt; album with John Mayall. There are several photos of him holding the late 1950s sunburst model he purchased used just before recording that album, which inspired Jeff Beck, Jimmy Page, Peter Green, and other British blues rock guitar heroes of the 1960s to purchase theirs. Clapton played Gibson Les Pauls, SGs, and I believe Firebirds during his Cream days, as well as during Blind Faith. He only switched to Stratocasters around the time of his first solo album in 1970. To this day, he also frequently plays Les Pauls and other Gibson guitars, particularly on more blues-based numbers, for a thicker sound. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fridhammar.com/londongear.html&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; for what looks like a pretty decent list of his 1960s guitars. 

I&#039;ve played guitar for over twenty years now, and went through periods of living and breathing this stuff, so believe me--I&#039;m not making up who played what, and when!

Regards,

Ed</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4305@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2003 01:08:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ed Driscoll on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/12/06/030749.php#comment-4304</link>
<description>Darryl,

I just noticed your comment. But for the record, B.B. King was only associated with Les Pauls very early in his career. (There&#039;s a photo of him looking &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; young and holding one &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lespaulforum.com/pagegallery.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;. He&#039;s much more known for his use of Gibson ES-335s and ES-355s, both semi-hollowbodied guitars, both larger than a Les Paul. 

Gibson&#039;s current &quot;Lucille&quot; model B.B. King signature guitar is essientially an ES-355 without f-holes, to reduce feedback. Compare &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gibson.com/products/gibson/Classic/Lucille.html&quot;&gt;this photograph of it&lt;/a&gt;, with this photo of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gibson.com/products/gibson/lespaul/Classic02.html&quot;&gt;a Les Paul&lt;/A&gt;, to see the difference between the two. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4304@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2003 00:58:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by darryl on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/12/06/030749.php#comment-2430</link>
<description>great article, but check your facts in your intro:

&quot;B.B. King and Chuck Berry did with the Gibson ES-335, or Hendrix did with the Fender Stratocaster, or Clapton and Page did with the Les Paul in the late 1960s. They didn&#039;t invent new technologies, the way that The Who did with the Marshall amplifier stack.&quot;

bb king played les pauls, namely Lucille.
clapton played strats, &quot;blackie&quot; of layla fame and &quot;brownie&quot; from most cream-era recordings.  GuitarPlayer published a few issues commemorating the landmark guitars and the musicians that wielded them for reference, but these should be obvious, especially Clapton&#039;s Stratocasters.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2430@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2002 06:19:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ed Driscoll on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/12/06/030749.php#comment-2429</link>
<description>Eric,

Thanks. With the exception of the Lennon photo (it was tough finding a decent shot of one of the Beatles holding an instrument that had been sanded down during their &quot;natural phase&quot;), they&#039;re all on &lt;a href=&quot;http://perso.club-internet.fr/bludream/&quot;&gt;this site&lt;/A&gt;, which has some other photos and trivia that might be of interest to a Beatles fan. 

Ed</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2429@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:13:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Fab Gear</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2002/12/06/030749.php#comment-2428</link>
<description>Great Ed! Fascinating review, great pics too.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2428@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:16:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>