Lennon-McCartney, I Mean McCartney-Lennon

Written by Eric Olsen
Published December 19, 2002

My impression is that Paul McCartney, who has been very much in the public eye of late, is getting something of a bad deal with the mostly negative reaction to his crusade to flip-flop Lennon/McCartney to McCartney/Lennon on the songs he primarily or exclusively wrote while he and John were the most famous songwriting duo on earth. He isn't trying to change the business side of it, he isn't excising John from the credits, just reversing the order FOR THE SONGS HE WROTE.

Big deal:

    McCartney, in a lengthy statement released on Wednesday, rejected suggestions that the widow of his late partner John Lennon might have a court case because he reversed the credits on Beatles songs on his latest album from the traditional "Lennon-McCartney" to "by Paul McCartney and John Lennon."

    McCartney's new album "Back In The U.S. Live 2002," lists 19 classic Beatles songs that way and McCartney said, "The truth is that this is much ado about nothing and there is no need for anybody to get their knickers in a twist."

    ....McCartney said Lennon accurately divided credit for each of their songs in a Playboy magazine article and that he and Lennon were in complete agreement as to who had done what. McCartney himself spelled out the exact writing credits for Barry Miles's book "Many Years From Now."

    McCartney said Beatles manager Brian Epstein and Lennon independently decided in Epstein's London office that the billing would be "songs by John Lennon and Paul McCartney"

    "I said 'What about McCartney/Lennon?' They said 'We'll do this for now and we can change it around to be fair at any point in the future,"' McCartney said. [Reuters]

I guess the time is now.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
Back in the U.S. Live 2002 Back in the U.S. Live 2002
Paul McCartney
Music,
The Beatles 1 The Beatles 1
The Beatles
Music,

Lennon-McCartney, I Mean McCartney-Lennon
Published: December 19, 2002
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: News
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Music: News
All Music Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 27, 2002 @ 13:50PM — Hazy Dave [URL]

The original songs on the "first" US Beatles LP, (Introducing The Beatles on Vee Jay, are credited to "McCartney-Lennon". Yoko should concentrate on hassling Michael Jackson...

#2 — December 27, 2002 @ 23:25PM — Eric Olsen

That's amazing Dave - where did you come up with the pics? Thanks very much.

#3 — January 6, 2003 @ 17:15PM — Hazy Dave [URL]

"A Comprehensive Discography
& Price Guide for VJLP-1062 - Introducing... The Beatles - The worlds most counterfeited album"
A very informative website, if more than you ever needed to know about the subject album, dismissed as "not suitable for the U.S. market" by the geniuses at Capitol Records and thus first released stateside by Chicago's Vee-Jay records...

#4 — December 31, 2007 @ 13:06PM — wolfman

in essence are not "all" albums "copies"?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/2348)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments