<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on <i>The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers</i></title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2002-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2003 09:43:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by KG on &lt;i&gt;The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/02/17/210403.php#comment-10000</link>
<description>it was a great movie! it had a few slow points, but it was overall great, maybe better than the first. there was definatly more humor in this film, to brighten dark moments. This movie had more dark moments and more battle sequences than the last also. I wouldn&#039;t chnge much about it! It&#039;s one of my favorites!
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F02%2F17%2F210403.php%23comment-10000&amp;itemDate=2003-05-25+09%3A43%3A45&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+KG+on+%3Ci%3EThe+Lord+of+the+Rings%3A+The+Two+Towers%3C%2Fi%3E"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F02%2F17%2F210403.php%23comment-10000&amp;itemDate=2003-05-25+09%3A43%3A45&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+KG+on+%3Ci%3EThe+Lord+of+the+Rings%3A+The+Two+Towers%3C%2Fi%3E" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10000@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2003 09:43:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>