Blogcritics Comments on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Comment by El Bicho on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Wed, 6 Aug 2008 00:00:26 EDT

geral, so glad to see your return here as you keep fighting the good fight. Your responses are a shaft of gold that illuminates the darkness. I would not fret about your detractors. JR has been known to fraudulently summarize pop albums as well, which many Danity Kane fans will attest to, and there are some who question if CR even has a heart, so it's no surprise that he comes off as insensitive.

Comment by Ruvy on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:56:01 EDT

Geral, Whatever points you wish to make on torture and imprisonment, the appropriate way to do so is to write an article on the issue. That way, instead of being condemned as an outsider and a stranger, you would be welcomed as a new voice at Blogcritics with something important to say. It's not that hard to become a writer here. Chris Rose, or Eric Olsen could give you information on what to do, and you'd be on your way. I, for one, am more interested in the issue of copyright protection and the views that Eric Olsen brings us in his too rare articles here. Gentlemen, can we continue onwards without further interruption, and allow Geral the opportunity to raise the issues of the living dead in his own separate article here?

Comment by Christopher Rose on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21:10:26 EDT

Yes. Of course. That's it. I've got a dark mind and an insensitive heart. It all makes sense now.

Comment by geral sosbee on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Tue, 5 Aug 2008 20:40:03 EDT

Christopher Rose writes: "Geral, is your unfounded rage getting the better of you? I'm the admin here ..." Such comments reflect a dark mind and an insensitive heart, as my reports focus on the ongoing covert torture program by the fbi and the cia against Targets.FACT.

Comment by geral sosbee on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Tue, 5 Aug 2008 20:36:37 EDT

'amusing' as written by Jordan Richardson (JR)reflects his disdain for the truth of my reports,even as he fraudulently summarizes same; JR would be the eager witness to a public execution or quartering, as he delights in attacking those concerning whom he has no capacity to comprehend.This is not my opinion; yet the above statement is FACT.

Comment by STM on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:22:15 EDT

Shouldn't this have been posted to the Conspiracy theories thread?? And how come American conspiracy theorists call people things like "Sir" and "Bucko" when they they don't much like them?? Geez America's a hard place to understand.

Comment by STM on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Sat, 12 Apr 2008 03:33:22 EDT

"my upcoming Willie Nelson boxset review" Something to look forward to ...

Comment by El Bicho on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:15:16 EDT

Brother Al, if it's enlightenment you seek, just wait for my upcoming Willie Nelson boxset review

Comment by Al Barger on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:06:54 EDT

Geral, Jesus Christ, Galileo, Obama and El Bicho - the controversial beacons of enlightenment. Stay strong, Geral!

Comment by El Bicho on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:08:00 EDT

geral, keep fighting the good fight. The masses usually fear and attack that which they don't or can't understand. History is filled with stories of men like Jesus Christ and Galileo who were persecuted for the truths they offered that mankind wasn't ready to accept. You stand in good company.

Comment by Jordan Richardson on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:01:36 EDT

A few things I find particularly amusing about Geral Sosbee: 1. He thinks that the fact that he didn't get a teaching job in China is the fault of the FBI/CIA and not the fault of a lack of qualifications or for a disinterest on behalf of the University of Hong Kong to hire someone characterized as "batshit crazy" to teach their students. 2. The largest portions of his website are tempered with "in my humble opinion or other such "disclaimers," this enabling him to get away with sweeping generalizations. It is his opinion that the FBI/CIA/military industrial complex is planning to "annihilate" certain cities in the United States. It is his opinion that the FBI/CIA/military industrial complex actually knows what those cities are and that human beings will be targeted for termination. 3. He believes that female FBI agents file "false sworn affidavits" accusing the "usually male" target of misconduct. He also believes that there is a "secret law" that allows the FBI to place impotence-causing drugs into the food of the "usually male target." This causes the "usually male target" to not be able to engage in intimate relationships. Also, food doesn't taste the same. 4. He points to "evidence" on other pages of his extensive "story" on his "website." When you click on the "evidence," you are given a disclaimer again that states "as always, the above is the opinion of Geral Sosbee." This permeates throughout the site and the evidence is shown, by and large, through the manifestations of the rantings and ravings of a wild man. In short, what I learned from Part 1 of Geral Sosbee's "story" on his "website" is the following: A. When I am turned down for a teaching job at a Chinese university (in Hong Kong), I can blame the FBI for it instead of my own lack of credentials and/or sanity. B. When a female FBI agent turns down my advances and/or my hand up her skirt, I can blame the FBI "false sworn affidavit" program for it. C. When my wife complains of a lack of intimacy due to impotence, I can now safely blame the Feds. I can also use this same excuse to point out how her meatloaf "sucks." D. I can say I have "evidence" to back up just about any claim I make. My "evidence" can be my opinion. E. I'd hit it, Geral. I'd hit it good.

Comment by Jordan Richardson on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:44:09 EDT

Frightful? Geral, a quick search of your name turns up an awful lot of strange and bizarre accusations. Perhaps the reason nobody is taking you seriously is because you come across as a bit less than credible. Your post was also dreadfully obscure, strange, and filled to the brim with nonsensical rhetoric that nobody but you and "Barbara Hartwell" seem to understand. There is no question about it that government, FBI, CIA, and host of other organizations need to be held accountable for various actions. But your accusations are unclear, muddled, and strange. Instead of presenting a cohesive case, you've decided to bounce from website to website to spread your own brand of conspiracy theory. It seems you're probably not doing your "cause" a lot of favours by resorting to wild accusations of comment deletion and paranoiac ramblings. Believe or not, the FBI has nothing to do with Blogcritics. In short: what the hell are you talking about?

Comment by Christopher Rose on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:47 EDT

Geral, you can either participate in this online conversation as it is or move along to another site. What you can't do is complain about the insults you perceive and then make attacks yourself.

Comment by geral sosbee on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:34:24 EDT

"The Fog of War"... is the same fog in the mind of a silly frightful boy Jordan Richardson.

Comment by Christopher Rose on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:33:08 EDT

Geral, is your unfounded rage getting the better of you? I'm the admin here and none of your comments have been removed.

Comment by Jordan Richardson on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:33:13 EDT

I think it's par for the course.

Comment by geral sosbee on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:02:25 EDT

repetitive gibberish; enlighten the reader as to the meaning of the profoundly evocative, yet meaningless "Id hit it."!and "I'd still hit it." I believe you indeed hit it, little one.

Comment by Jordan Richardson on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:50:08 EDT

I'd still hit it.

Comment by geral sosbee on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:43:34 EDT

The admin here is an unethical and cowardly punk for his removing my posts and permitting personal verbal assaults on me by his favorite low minded posters.

Comment by Clavos on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:37:42 EDT

I just looked at Mr. Sosbee's links. He is (he claims) a former FBI agent who is being persecuted for reasons too obscurely hidden in his website for me to discover before I lost interest in remaining there. It's a creepy, paranoid site. His ramblings and ravings read very much like those of every other conspiracy-obsessed individual who's ever posted on these threads. Only the details (what few are offered) change.

Comment by Christopher Rose on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:16:08 EDT

I'm not exactly sure how a simple statement of fact is a silly comment but there you go.

Comment by geral sosbee on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:03:38 EDT

"fancy accusations" seems to be your present purpose, Chris. I simply posted and received a number of silly comments like the one you, Sir, just posted.

Comment by Christopher Rose on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:47:00 EDT

Mostly we all know each other, Geral, it's you that's the stranger and making fancy accusations...

Comment by geral sosbee on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:49:56 EDT

such incredible insight boys and girls; tell us your true names so we may credit you for something other than your fear of being identified.

Comment by Bennett on A Serious Challenge to Orthodoxy

Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:48:09 EDT

Ha! duane...