<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Critiquees - Jazz Album of the Year</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:00:44 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/02/21/133458.php#comment-3818</link>
<description>see, no one listens to or knows real jazz anymore.

so to have two seperate jazz categories would be kind of redundant.

peace.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3818@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:00:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by battez</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/02/21/133458.php#comment-3810</link>
<description>This is really lame - norah jones should totally be in the pop category and the others are kind of bland jazz. I wish awards would have a separate category for populist jazz and another for jazz that does feature improvisation in its assembling of the musical text. David Ware is alright. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3810@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:51:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ben Welsh</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/02/21/133458.php#comment-3781</link>
<description>This must be a joke. Calling Norah Jones jazz is like calling Jimmy Kimmel erudite. Her album is nothing but bland jazz-lite for the Starbucks crowd. Have any of you even heard of Patricia Barber?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3781@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:27:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>