<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:52:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by John Doe on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/29/165927.php#comment-12755</link>
<description>Ya lady your a nut case as millions of other people are thinking.I havent takled to a person yet who hasnt liked the movie (matrix reloaded). I think your parents were the ones who shot the blank.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12755@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:52:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/29/165927.php#comment-10428</link>
<description>I enjoyed &lt;i&gt;Dark City&lt;/i&gt;, and thought it was underrated, partly because it was released so near to the superior &lt;i&gt;Matrix&lt;/i&gt;, though that wasn&#039;t the only factor, obviously.

However, the comparisons are extremely superficial. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10428@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:14:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester48 on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/29/165927.php#comment-10426</link>
<description>the worst thing is, i can see the overall story (excluding the animatrix series) becoming an extended ripoff of the story to Dark City.
It&#039;s not an immediately obvious comparison (not to me neway) bcos they do seem quite different - it&#039;s only when you think of the stories in a general sense that you get it: (WARNING: imminent spoilers, don&#039;t read if you don&#039;t like spoilers ok)
Dark City was about a group of beings having control over a whole city which they built, which was populated with humans.  The beings had almost complete control over the city, by being able to pause the whole thing.  However throughout its history there had been one or two humans born that were unnaffected by the pause thing and were able to have almost the same amount of control as the beings.  One day, one of these people discovers what&#039;s going on in the city.  He fights the beings and, right at the end, discovers that the whole city is it....they are on a ship travelling through space.  Rather than expose everyone to this horrifying fact, he decides to reshape the city to his liking then go back to living a normal life with a woman he loves.

The matrix plot is about a group of beings (machines) having complete control over a world populated by real people.  Every so often a person is born that can manipulate the world just like the machines.  So far they have failed in their fight against the controllers BUT now there is Neo.  However at the end of The Matrix Reloaded there is the hint that they are actually still inside the matrix when they think they are in the real world - Neo says something is different, he can sense the sentinals...

It will be a damn shame if it does turn out to follow the Dark City plot.  OK it&#039;s not a big ripoff but adding loads of technological stuff to a copied story framework does not an original film (or film series) make.
Also is the depressing fact that Dark City gorssed so much less than The Matrix or Reloaded, even though it is a superior film.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10426@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2003 08:16:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Pedrobrown on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/29/165927.php#comment-10420</link>
<description>Ok... I admit it... the movie sucks. I went to see it the third time and, man, itīs the example of how to turn a great story into a great parody of itīs self. 

Even though the dialogues are worthless, nobody buys the CGI Keanus, Zion is an unoriginal melting pot of  Star Wars and Terminator, the editting is crap, the music is crap, and some carachters are just bane and irrelevant (the twins, the councilor, the agents) I guess Iīll wait up for Revolutions just to see the only thing that seems to save this whole damn matrix &quot;ball of crap&quot;... the storyline. That is getting better. Hopefully, itīll make up for all the other screw-ups...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10420@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2003 04:33:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Treacher on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/29/165927.php#comment-10316</link>
<description>&quot;Major bombshell?&quot; Oh no, Agent Smith is in some guy&#039;s brain! Hope he doesn&#039;t start cutting his own hand again!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10316@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jun 2003 14:04:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/29/165927.php#comment-10206</link>
<description>I remember less than a minute after that point, during which we learn that the ambush has failed (raising tension) and that Bane/Smith was responsible (raising many questions). To end it without that cliffhanger seems like it would be less appealing to me, not more. And it would shave less than a minute (rough estimate from memory) off the film, so why?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10206@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 21:13:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Robert Jones on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/29/165927.php#comment-10202</link>
<description>&quot;When, exactly? Concidering the major bombshell dropped within the last 10 seconds of the film, and the mind-bending scene a minute before that, when exactly should the film have ended?&quot;

&lt;b&gt;SPOILERS FOLLOW&lt;/b&gt;


















I would have ended it just after Neo went comatose after dealing with the Squiddies.  That was a high-point of drama, and would have rung much more true to me than where the break point actuall was -- which seemed to be trying to hard to say, &quot;Look!  It&#039;s this guy!  You know him!...  tune in next week to see what he&#039;s up to!&quot;




</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10202@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 17:59:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn on The Matrix:  Shooting Blanks</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/29/165927.php#comment-10199</link>
<description>&quot;simply cutting it off five minutes earlier would have made a much better break point.&quot;

When, exactly? Concidering the major bombshell dropped within the last 10 seconds of the film, and the mind-bending scene a minute before that, when exactly should the film have ended?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10199@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 17:41:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>